跳到正文
r/MachineLearning· /u/benedict-armstrong·· 4 小时前AI 评分45

有人为 ICLR 超 4 万篇投稿做了个预测市场,用下注帮论文排序

ICLR submissions are broken. Maybe a prediction market? [P]

AI 导读

针对 ICLR 今年收到超 4 万篇投稿、其中不少由 AI 生成的现状,有开发者搭建了一个预测市场,让用户对论文下注以区分好坏。该市场不使用真钱,定位为游戏,不打算取代同行评审,并附带一个论文发现地图。

正文

ICLR has received >40k submissions this year and it is becoming quite difficult to make sense of all of the papers (including a lot of AI generated ones).

Larry Wasserman called for “A World Without Referees” back in 2012 [1], but peer review hasn’t changed much since. I built https://acceptodds.com, as an attempt to maybe help sort out the good from the bad through a prediction market (not with real money, it's a game and not intended to replace peer review). Oh and it also has a cool map for discovering papers :).

If you’ve interested or you've submitted to ICLR check out what the market thinks of your paper and bet on some papers in your area. LMK what you think or if you have any interesting ideas for it!

[1] https://www.stat.cmu.edu/~brian/zach-00/765-2019/764-2016/week05/refereeing/Larry-Abolish-the-Peer-Review.pdf

submitted by /u/benedict-armstrong
[link] [留言]

来源:r/MachineLearning · reddit.com