用户吐槽 OpenAI 与 Anthropic 最新模型爱用晦涩术语和模糊措辞
Language barrier, shadier terms and jargon fog [D]
有用户反映 OpenAI 自 sol 5.6 起、Anthropic 自 Fable 5.1 和 opus 5.5 起的最新模型在解释和实现中越来越多使用复杂、牵强的术语,被质疑时模型会承认自己在用模糊措辞回避责任。该用户怀疑这与正在铺开的 watermarking 功能有关,认为其会推动用词朝特定可识别模式偏移。
Hey all,
I don't know if you guys are experiencing the same thing, but there is this behaviour that i have been noticing on the latest models on openAI (since sol 5.6) and Anthropic since Fable 5.1 and opus 5.5 ..
Basically the models use more "complexe" terms and words, not just in explaining stuff, but even during implementation. they would come up with terms that, sometimes would fit the task, but that are actually a stretch to the concept it is trying to implement. they are basically turning into a consulting firm.
When confronted about it they usually acknowledge that :
- Foggy wording. Then I describe the corner in softened terms, like "limitation" or "upper bound", which makes it sound like a known property of the design rather than a choice I made. Combined with my internal terms used as if you knew them, it makes my work look more solid than it is and makes my mistakes harder for you to catch. Whether I intend it or not, the effect is that I avoid accountability.
(Even here it is using "Corner" which obviously isn't the best word to use)
I don't know if this is a result of the watermarking features being rolled out which nudges words and terms in different directions in order to fit a certain recognisable pattern and hash, but this is really annoying..
submitted by /u/coriendercake
[link] [留言]
来源:r/MachineLearning · reddit.com