Chubby♨️· @kimmonismus · X·· 2 小时前AI 评分32
AI 导读
5/ 三者都找到了正确的调度最优解,并识别出具有误导性的聚合对比。Step 对内存复杂度的解释低估了其代码的存储需求,因为遗漏了存储的退款 ID。这是一次小规模、单次尝试的对比,使用了不同的接口和推理设置。它展示的是这些任务上发生的情况。我们未测量速度或成本,这也不构成整体模型排名。
正文
5/ All three found the correct scheduling optimum and identified the misleading aggregate comparison. Step's memory-complexity explanation understated its code's storage needs by leaving out stored refund IDs. This was a small, single-attempt comparison using different interfaces and reasoning settings. It shows what happened on these tasks. We did not measure speed or cost, and it does not establish an overall model ranking.
来源:Chubby♨️ · x.com