硕士论文的扩散策略加速器离线指标良好但真机部署失败,该不该投 MLSys?
What to do with my paper, for MLsys conference? [R]
一位硕士生为机器人策略中的扩散动作生成搭建了加速器,离线输出与原模型的中位绝对偏差极小,但真机执行“取书放上书架”任务时效果不如原模型。他询问投 MLSys 时是否应只报离线结果、如何呈现失败的部署实验,以及为何极小中位偏差仍会导致任务失败。他猜测原因是尾部误差与闭环误差累积,并考虑补充百分位误差、单步误差和仿真闭环成功率等指标。
For my master’s thesis I built an accelerator for diffusion-based action generation in robotics policies. Offline, it looks great: the median absolute deviation between the accelerated output and the original model’s output is extremely small, so I concluded it reproduces the model’s behavior faithfully.
When I deployed it on a real robot for a task (picking up a book and placing it on a shelf), it did not work as well as the original model. The offline numbers did not predict the real-world result.
I want to submit this to MLSys. My offline results are strong, but the deployment result is negative. My questions:
- Is it acceptable to submit with only the offline results, or should I include the failed deployment?
- If I include it, how do I frame it so it adds to the paper instead of sinking it?
- Why might a tiny median deviation still lead to task failure? My guesses are tail errors and error compounding in closed loop, but I would like other views.
- What additional metrics would you report (percentiles, per-step error, closed-loop success rate in simulation)?
Any experience from people who have submitted systems papers with negative real-world results is very welcome.
submitted by /u/Significant_Bee_2025
[link] [留言]
来源:r/MachineLearning · reddit.com