跳到正文
r/MachineLearning· /u/Significant_Bee_2025·· 3 小时前AI 评分26

硕士论文的扩散策略加速器离线指标良好但真机部署失败,该不该投 MLSys?

What to do with my paper, for MLsys conference? [R]

AI 导读

一位硕士生为机器人策略中的扩散动作生成搭建了加速器,离线输出与原模型的中位绝对偏差极小,但真机执行“取书放上书架”任务时效果不如原模型。他询问投 MLSys 时是否应只报离线结果、如何呈现失败的部署实验,以及为何极小中位偏差仍会导致任务失败。他猜测原因是尾部误差与闭环误差累积,并考虑补充百分位误差、单步误差和仿真闭环成功率等指标。

正文

For my master’s thesis I built an accelerator for diffusion-based action generation in robotics policies. Offline, it looks great: the median absolute deviation between the accelerated output and the original model’s output is extremely small, so I concluded it reproduces the model’s behavior faithfully.

When I deployed it on a real robot for a task (picking up a book and placing it on a shelf), it did not work as well as the original model. The offline numbers did not predict the real-world result.

I want to submit this to MLSys. My offline results are strong, but the deployment result is negative. My questions:

  1. Is it acceptable to submit with only the offline results, or should I include the failed deployment?
  2. If I include it, how do I frame it so it adds to the paper instead of sinking it?
  3. Why might a tiny median deviation still lead to task failure? My guesses are tail errors and error compounding in closed loop, but I would like other views.
  4. What additional metrics would you report (percentiles, per-step error, closed-loop success rate in simulation)?

Any experience from people who have submitted systems papers with negative real-world results is very welcome.

submitted by /u/Significant_Bee_2025
[link] [留言]

来源:r/MachineLearning · reddit.com