一项针对 ARC-AGI-3 的受控研究发现,LLM 对 harness 做两次完整重写后,留出集分数仅提升 2.80 分,且 95% 区间跨过零。每个前沿模型从固定的编码 bootstrap 出发写出完整 harness,在 5 个开发游戏上运行后重写全部代码库两次,所有版本都在 20 个不参与重写的游戏上评分。
Can LLMs improve their own harness?
Self-improving harnesses are a hot topic.
And one interesting question is whether LLMs can generate and improve them on their own.
They find that two full rewrites of the harness raise held-out scores by only 2.80 points, and the 95% interval crosses zero.
Each frontier model writes a complete harness from a fixed coding bootstrap, plays five development games through it, and then rewrites its whole codebase twice. Every version is scored on 20 games that never influence the rewrites.
Across 27 lineages, first harnesses range from zero to near-ceiling. The revisions add very little. Gains on the development games overstate the held-out gains, and revisions that cut inference cost often lower the score.
Human-steered systems still score higher on the same games, so better designs exist. The models just do not find them reliably on their own yet.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30499
Chat with Paper: https://academy.dair.ai/papers/can-llms-improve-their-own-harness-a-controlled-study-on-arc-agi-3-2610.30499
来源:elvis · x.com