跳到正文
Arena.ai· @arena · X·· 4 小时前AI 评分47
AI 导读

Arena.ai 基于 Agent Arena 上 20,869 条 trace,对比了 Anthropic 与 OpenAI 五款顶级模型与其他智能体的用户批评分布。在出现抱怨的会话中,前沿模型的失败修复循环少 6.9 个百分点,设计问题少 6.4 pp、结果不可用少 5.8 pp,指令遵循、任务完成和破坏已有代码的问题分别少 5.6、4.9、4.5 pp。

正文

Where do users actually feel the difference with a frontier coding agent?

Across 20,869 Agent Arena traces, we compared how users criticized the five top models (all from @AnthropicAI & @OpenAI) on Agent Arena: Code, versus how they criticized other agents.

Here are 3 areas where frontier models make the most difference:

1. Less getting stuck: Among sessions with complaints, failed repair loops come up 6.9 percentage points less often, and project context gets ignored less often too (-1.9 pp). You spend less time steering the agent out of dead ends.

2. Better taste and code that works: They are better at design (-6.4 pp) and at producing working results (-5.8 pp). What you get back is more likely to be what you wanted.

3. More diligence: They follow instructions better (-5.6 pp), finish the work more often (-4.9 pp) and break existing work less (-4.5 pp). There's less to clean up afterwards.

Curious for a deeper dive into Agent Arena's praise vs complaint signal? See the article below in thread.

来源:Arena.ai · x.com