一项针对漏洞挖掘 AI 智能体的分析显示,4 个智能体的 200 次运行中,60.4% 的 token 花在理解代码和推理如何触发漏洞上,而现有省钱方法在与普通智能体的对比中仅 24.4% 能在更低成本下保持成功率。
AI agents that hunt security bugs spend 60.4% of their tokens understanding code and reasoning about how to trigger the bug, so that is where cost cuts should aim.
AI agents hunting security bugs can burn millions of tokens without producing an input that crashes the program. Across 200 runs from 4 agents, 60.4% of tokens went to understanding code and reasoning about how to trigger the bug.
Existing cost-saving methods rarely helped. Only 24.4% of head-to-head comparisons with the plain agent kept success at lower cost.
So they built AVRI, a tool that returns related code together and saves the links between program input and the unsafe operation. On 20 new tasks, it cut total cost by 18.0% for Codex and 23.7% for OpenCode without lowering success or recall.
Before adding generic cost tricks to a security agent, measure where its tokens go and let it reuse what it learned about the code.
来源:Rohan Paul · x.com