Ethan Mollick· @emollick · X·· 3 小时前AI 评分54
AI 导读
一项针对 124 篇哈佛社会科学论文的研究显示，Opus 4.8 在同行评审的各项指标上都胜过人类专家，论文覆盖统计分析、形式模型到定性研究。Ethan Mollick 据此提出，学术界需要尽快思考如何让科学研究实践适应 AI。
正文
By every measure, Opus 4.8 beats human experts as peer reviewers in a study of 124 Harvard social science papers covering a range from statistical analyses to formal models to qualitative work.
As academics, we need to figure out how to adapt the practice of science to AI, fast.
来源：Ethan Mollick · x.com